<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Michigan Journal of Environmental &#38; Administrative Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal</link>
	<description>Legal journal of enviromental and administrative law at university of michigan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Loopholes, Closed:  D.C. Circuit Strikes Down EPA’s Exemption Provisions in its Air Quality Program</title>
		<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/loopholes-closed-d-c-circuit-strikes-down-epa%e2%80%99s-exemption-provisions-in-its-air-quality-program/</link>
		<comments>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/loopholes-closed-d-c-circuit-strikes-down-epa%e2%80%99s-exemption-provisions-in-its-air-quality-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Tengel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In October 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a rule[i] exempting certain polluting facilities from conducting air-quality monitoring as part of the Clean Air Act’s permitting process. [ii] The agency thought it had the authority to exempt the facilities because their emissions were not significant enough to justify the costs of monitoring.  The D.C. Court [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/loopholes-closed-d-c-circuit-strikes-down-epa%e2%80%99s-exemption-provisions-in-its-air-quality-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Urban Renewal and the Public Use Requirement</title>
		<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/urban-renewal-and-the-public-use-requirement/</link>
		<comments>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/urban-renewal-and-the-public-use-requirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kamal Al-Salihi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The takings issue has received much attention since the famous (or infamous) Kelo v. City of New London[1] decision. This blog post is intended to highlight the complexity behind a simple requirement, that the state appropriate land for a “public use.” What constitutes a “public use” is clear at the extremes, but can otherwise become [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/urban-renewal-and-the-public-use-requirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farm Bill to Face Strong Criticism from Every Angle&#8230;Again</title>
		<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/farm-bill-to-face-strong-criticism-from-every-angle-again-3/</link>
		<comments>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/farm-bill-to-face-strong-criticism-from-every-angle-again-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Farm bill is a piece of legislation addressing most of the federal government’s policies related to domestic agriculture.  Traditionally, a new bill is passed every five years.  The most recent bill, passed in 2008, has had pieces extended to the end of September, 2013, while other parts were allowed to expire last October.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/farm-bill-to-face-strong-criticism-from-every-angle-again-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Power Lines</title>
		<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/federal-power-lines-2/</link>
		<comments>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/federal-power-lines-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 03:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Duffy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In President Obama’s recent Inaugural Address, he renewed the call for Federal action on climate change, a political and technical challenge that has stymied policymakers for decades. The national discourse on climate change has centered around energy policy and the need for increasing renewable energy sources. Advocates argue that the use of renewable energy will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/federal-power-lines-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contesting the Navy&#8217;s Authorization to &#8216;Take&#8217; Marine Mammals Requires a Balance Between Environmental and National Security Interests</title>
		<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/contesting-the-navys-authorization-to-take-marine-mammals-requires-a-balance-between-environmental-and-national-security-interests/</link>
		<comments>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/contesting-the-navys-authorization-to-take-marine-mammals-requires-a-balance-between-environmental-and-national-security-interests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angela Xu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/?p=553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 31, 2013, the Federal Register published a proposed rule that would allow the Navy to harm marine mammals on more than 31 million separate instances from 2014 to 2019.[1] The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) authored the draft rule authorizing the Navy to “take” whales and dolphins during the course of its testing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/contesting-the-navys-authorization-to-take-marine-mammals-requires-a-balance-between-environmental-and-national-security-interests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Student Health Insurance Plans Treated Differently Under the Affordable Care Act?</title>
		<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/why-are-student-health-insurance-plans-treated-differently-under-the-affordable-care-act-6/</link>
		<comments>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/why-are-student-health-insurance-plans-treated-differently-under-the-affordable-care-act-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Casner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA” or, more commonly, “Obamacare”) into law by on March 23, 2010.[1] Several provisions of this act, including the individual mandate and Medicaid expansion, were hotly debated[2] and litigated, resulting in a 5-4 Supreme Court decision upholding their constitutionality.[3] In the midst of this debate, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/03/why-are-student-health-insurance-plans-treated-differently-under-the-affordable-care-act-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Laughing Matter: Utah’s Fight to Reclaim Federal Lands</title>
		<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/no-laughing-matter-utah%e2%80%99s-fight-to-reclaim-federal-lands/</link>
		<comments>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/no-laughing-matter-utah%e2%80%99s-fight-to-reclaim-federal-lands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Austin Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On its face, Utah’s Transfer of Public Land Act (hereinafter “TPLA”)[i], like those recently passed by Arizona[ii] and Idaho[iii], seems as authoritative a demand as that of a child to his parent: (1) On or before December 31, 2014, the United States shall: (a) extinguish title to public lands; and (b) transfer title to public [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/no-laughing-matter-utah%e2%80%99s-fight-to-reclaim-federal-lands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can’t Quite Get It Right: The EPA’s Failed Attempts at Interstate Pollution Regulation</title>
		<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/can%e2%80%99t-quite-get-it-right-the-epa%e2%80%99s-failed-attempts-at-interstate-pollution-regulation-2/</link>
		<comments>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/can%e2%80%99t-quite-get-it-right-the-epa%e2%80%99s-failed-attempts-at-interstate-pollution-regulation-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 03:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the end of January, the EPA’s efforts to regulate ozone and fine particle were again frustrated, this time by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit’s decision not to reconsider its August 2012 remand of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR).[1] This is just the latest in a series of setbacks for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/can%e2%80%99t-quite-get-it-right-the-epa%e2%80%99s-failed-attempts-at-interstate-pollution-regulation-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s Open Government Initiative: Progress Report</title>
		<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/obama%e2%80%99s-open-government-initiative-progress-report/</link>
		<comments>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/obama%e2%80%99s-open-government-initiative-progress-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Merron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In President Obama’s first term in office, he made a bold promise to “usher in a new era of open government”[i] as he laid out his vision for increased transparency and accountability in the federal government. As part of his open government initiative, he directed federal agencies to make publicly available their daily operations and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/obama%e2%80%99s-open-government-initiative-progress-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Pipeline to a New Water Era?</title>
		<link>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/a-pipeline-to-a-new-water-era/</link>
		<comments>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/a-pipeline-to-a-new-water-era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alison Toivola</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My last blog post was about a pipeline to carry fuel. I thought it would be interesting to keep the same pipeline theme going for my latest post, so I decided to write about another proposed pipeline. But this time around, it’s not about fuel. It’s about water. The Colorado River is a precious water [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://students.law.umich.edu/mjeal/2013/02/a-pipeline-to-a-new-water-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
